My abbreviated unit has forced me to
really consider how I feel about tests. The fact is, I don't like
them. Specifically, multiple choice, true-false, matching kinds of
tests. I understand that they are a part of the landscape in
schooling today, but that doesn't mean that I need to embrace them.
The fact is, I don't have time for one in this unit, and I don't
think I'll miss it. But, I do need to have something that will work
as a summative assessment. I think the projects the students are
doing will be a good measure of their learning. They're a better
indicator of their deep understanding of the work. However, when I
designed the projects, I was imagining I would also give the students
a test similar to what my CT usually gives them after they read a
book. His rationale is that the test measures whether they have a
basic understanding of the book and the project will measure the
deeper understanding. My thoughts are that they must have that basic
understanding in order to demonstrate the deeper understanding. So,
why do the test at all? I guess I don't really see the point. At the
same time, I told the students they would have a test. I kind of need
test scores to use in my analysis for my KPTP, also. So, I think I'll
be giving a test, as promised. But, it will be open book, open notes,
short answer, requiring a synthesis of their knowledge of the book,
not just their ability to choose a letter from A to D. They'll be
asked to explain a few quotes, find examples of literary techniques,
and analyze a character's motives, using examples and quotes from the
text. It will take longer for me to grade, but I think it's a better,
fairer measure of their understanding of the text.
I will also be giving them a vocabulary
quiz, but the truth is that I'm a little wary of that as well. I
think use of the vocabulary is a better indicator that they have
really assimilated it. But, in this instance, I am going to give in
to the fill-in-the-blank test, simply because I want the students to
know they really are accountable for memorizing it and knowing it.
They have to memorize it before they can assimilate it further.
Ideally, I would like to build my
entire year-long plan around writing and projects within a theme,
much as has been suggested in our Bomer and Smagorinsky texts. With
my student-teaching, I don't feel like I have the freedom, the
authority, or the time to do it properly. In many ways, my work this
semester has had to fit in with what my CT does. After all, it is
still his classroom and the students are accustomed to his structure.
But, working within another teacher's structure has really helped me
clarify how I would like my structure to differ. It's almost like
trying on another persona and realizing that yours is the best fit
for you after all. It's nice to have that reassurance. It builds my
confidence in my ability to create meaningful plans to create
meaningful learning.
Lara,
ReplyDeleteI had so many plans for my unit's sumative assessment. I wanted to make it super extra authentic, but with the dang snow days I was forced to do a much quicker written test. I think students actually have to know more about the topic if they want a good grade on a project than they do on a written test. I had my students put an "X" by the questions that they guessed on because I have a hard time believing the validity of any multiple choice/match/true false test.
Anyway, good luck with your assessments. I hope next unit you'll get your wish and we have enough time to do what we want and what we planned for :)
Lara, I could see you developing this post into an essay for submission to KATE Update or even Kansas English. It really wouldn't require too much work on your part either. It's thoughtful, informed, and a little bit provocative (with the no testing philosophy). I love it!!
ReplyDelete